|
|
|
|
Please check back from time to time as we add more evidence.
EVP #1 This is an EVP we captured in a stairwell at a commercial location in Georgia. It is clearly two words, but we can't make out exactly what is being said.
EVP #2 This is an EVP from the same commercial location in Georgia. We had split into 3 groups and when 1 of the groups left a room, the client asked "are they out of the costume loft". The EVP is the faint whisper that follows.
EVP #3 This is an EVP I caught on our 1st investigation. It is very faint and sounds like a young child saying "Hey y'all lookin in the phone book?" What makes this EVP so interesting is the client later told us that their son (who was not home at the time of the investigation) had brought the phone book in from the driveway and left it in the garage to dry from the rain.
Noise This is an interesting noise. It is also from our 1st investigation. There had been 3 of us in the room for over an hour and nothing was happening. The claim was of a young child (see EVP #3). I sent the other 2 investigators out of the room on the theory that if it was a child it might be scared of 3 adults in the room looking for him/her. Within 5 minutes it sounded like something was thrown across the attic above the room I was in. We could not get access to the attic to investigate the noise any further, but it was interesting that a room that was quiet for over an hour became "active" so quickly in a one on one situation. From the outside of the home we could see no animal access to the attic.
This next piece of evidence has sparked much debate amongst our team and some of our friends. It was NOT presented to the client because the evidence is contaminated as I will explain. We were doing an EVP session and taking temperature readings. After feeling cold spots in the room, the sensitives were picking up on someone in the room with us and we were trying to get them to manipulate the temperature. One of the thermometers we were using had a laser built in to it so we could know where we were reading temps. In this photo you can clearly see the small red dot from the laser that was in use. The movement was quite erratic and the laser did not give off much light. The questioned "orb" seen in this photo was much larger and brighter, cast off it's own light, and moved much more smoothly. There were crystals and a glass ball in the room so we believe it is entirely possible that the laser was refracted to create this "orb".....but if this were the case why would it be a source of light, and when a light is spread out to cover a larger area it does not gain photons and become brighter. Now you see our dilemma. Either way the possibility of the "orb" being created by refracting the laser caused us to toss this piece of evidence as contaminated.
NOW that we're all on the same page, click here to see the video.
In this photo you can see a perfect example of why we at ESP Investigations generally do not present "orb" photos as evidence. While at an auto race at a dirt track I had a momentary lapse in thought and actually took a picture using my flash. These "Spirit Orbs" you are seeing are actually the flash reflecting off dust particles in the air. You can get the same effect from rain, fog, and bugs. Cigarette smoke and fog will produce white vapor mists that some people have tried to pass off as evidence. I am actually glad I took this photo because it is probably the easiest way to present a good example of why most of the classic "orb" photo's are garbage.
|
|
|